翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Garner Ekstran ・ Garner Farm ・ Garner Field ・ Garner H. Tullis ・ Garner Independent School District ・ Garner Lake (Alberta) ・ Garner Lake Provincial Park ・ Garner Magnet High School ・ Garner Mill ・ Garner News ・ Garner on Language and Writing ・ Garner State Park ・ Garner Ted Armstrong ・ Garner Township, Pottawattamie County, Iowa ・ Garner Tullis ・ Garner v. Board of Public Works ・ Garner v. Louisiana ・ Garner's Modern American Usage ・ Garner, Arkansas ・ Garner, Boyd County, Kentucky ・ Garner, Iowa ・ Garner, Kentucky ・ Garner, Knott County, Kentucky ・ Garner, North Carolina ・ Garner, Texas ・ Garnerans ・ Garnerin Point ・ Garnerville, New York ・ Garnes ・ Garnes Township, Red Lake County, Minnesota Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Garner v. Board of Public Works ： ウィキペディア英語版 Garner v. Board of Public Works ''Garner v. Board of Public Works'', 341 U.S. 716 (1951), is a ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that a municipal loyalty oath which required an oath and affidavit about one's beliefs and actions for the previous five years and which was enacted more than five years previous is not an ex post facto law nor a bill of attainder. ==Background== In 1941, the California State Legislature amended the charter of the city of Los Angeles so that no person could obtain or retain public employment with the city if they advocated the violent overthrow of either the state or federal government, belonged to any organization that did so advocate, or had advocated or been a member of an organization which advocated such action in the last five years. In 1948, the city of Los Angeles passed local ordinance No, 94,004, which required all employees to take the loyalty oath. Fifteen employees with the Los Angeles Board of Public Works refused to execute the required affidavit. At an administrative hearing on January 6, 1949, all 15 individuals were fired. They sued for back pay and reinstatement in their jobs, claiming that the oath and the affidavit they were required to execute constituted a bill of attainder and an ex post facto law. The District Court of Appeals denied relief. The petitioners then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted certiorari. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Garner v. Board of Public Works」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.